NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A4000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 140 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Um etwa 60% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 16 GB vs 10 GB
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB vs 10 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Etwa 96% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 10% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Etwa 55% höhere Texturfüllrate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- Etwa 42% höhere Leitungssysteme: 8704 vs 6144
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 vs 19545
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 1026
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 121768
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 420.465
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 4156.52
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 32.297
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 162.131
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1895.111
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 22050
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 22050
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4420 vs 2604
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 8704 vs 6144 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 vs 19545 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 1026 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 121768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 420.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 4156.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 32.297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 162.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1895.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 vs 2604 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 25146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 1053 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 4420 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 108 | 56 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $699 | |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1560 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt | 320 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 16 GB | 10 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 320 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |