AMD A10-4600M vs AMD A10-4655M

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-4600M and AMD A10-4655M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-4600M

  • Around 14% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1078 vs 909
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1938 vs 1658
  • Around 34% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 354 vs 264
  • Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 912 vs 703
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.171 vs 2.88
  • Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.506 vs 10.709
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1371
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3279 vs 3232
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1371
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3279 vs 3232
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1078 vs 909
PassMark - CPU mark 1938 vs 1658
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 354 vs 264
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 912 vs 703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.171 vs 2.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.506 vs 10.709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1695 vs 1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3279 vs 3232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1695 vs 1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3279 vs 3232

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-4655M

  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.434 vs 7.18
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.364 vs 0.162
  • 21.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.12 vs 1.896
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 10.434 vs 7.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.364 vs 0.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 40.12 vs 1.896

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-4600M
CPU 2: AMD A10-4655M

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1078
909
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1938
1658
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
354
264
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
912
703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.171
2.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
7.18
10.434
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.162
0.364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
13.506
10.709
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.896
40.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1695
1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3279
3232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1695
1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3279
3232
Name AMD A10-4600M AMD A10-4655M
PassMark - Single thread mark 1078 909
PassMark - CPU mark 1938 1658
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 354 264
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 912 703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.171 2.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.18 10.434
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.162 0.364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.506 10.709
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.896 40.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1695 1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3279 3232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1695 1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3279 3232

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A10-4600M AMD A10-4655M

Essentials

Architecture codename Trinity Trinity
Launch date 15 May 2012 15 May 2012
Place in performance rating 2051 2052
Series AMD A-Series AMD A-Series
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 246 mm 246 mm
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 4 MB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 32 nm
Maximum frequency 3.2 GHz 2.8 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of threads 4 4
Transistor count 1303 Million 1303 Million
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 100 °C

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FS1r2 FP2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Advanced Technologies

Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)