AMD A10-4600M versus AMD A10-4655M
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-4600M et AMD A10-4655M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-4600M
- Environ 14% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.2 GHz versus 2.8 GHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1078 versus 909
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1938 versus 1658
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 354 versus 264
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 912 versus 703
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.171 versus 2.88
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.506 versus 10.709
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 versus 1371
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3279 versus 3232
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 versus 1371
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3279 versus 3232
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz versus 2.8 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1078 versus 909 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1938 versus 1658 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 354 versus 264 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 912 versus 703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.171 versus 2.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.506 versus 10.709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 versus 1371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3279 versus 3232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 versus 1371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3279 versus 3232 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-4655M
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.434 versus 7.18
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.364 versus 0.162
- 21.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.12 versus 1.896
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.434 versus 7.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.364 versus 0.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.12 versus 1.896 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-4600M
CPU 2: AMD A10-4655M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-4600M | AMD A10-4655M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1078 | 909 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1938 | 1658 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 354 | 264 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 912 | 703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.171 | 2.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.18 | 10.434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.162 | 0.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.506 | 10.709 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.896 | 40.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 | 1371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3279 | 3232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 | 1371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3279 | 3232 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-4600M | AMD A10-4655M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Trinity | Trinity |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 15 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2051 | 2052 |
Série | AMD A-Series | AMD A-Series |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L1 | 192 KB | 192 KB |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4096 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 1303 Million | 1303 Million |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 100 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FS1r2 | FP2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies élevé |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |