AMD A10-4600M versus AMD A10-4655M

Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-4600M et AMD A10-4655M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A10-4600M

versus

AMD A10-4655M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-4600M

Environ 14% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.2 GHz versus 2.8 GHz
Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1078 versus 909
Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1938 versus 1658
Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 354 versus 264
Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 912 versus 703
Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.171 versus 2.88
Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.506 versus 10.709
Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 versus 1371
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3279 versus 3232
Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 versus 1371
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3279 versus 3232

Caractéristiques
Fréquence maximale	3.2 GHz versus 2.8 GHz
Référence
PassMark - Single thread mark	1078 versus 909
PassMark - CPU mark	1938 versus 1658
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	354 versus 264
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	912 versus 703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.171 versus 2.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.506 versus 10.709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695 versus 1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3279 versus 3232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695 versus 1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3279 versus 3232

Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-4655M

Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.434 versus 7.18
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.364 versus 0.162
21.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.12 versus 1.896

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt versus 35 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	10.434 versus 7.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.364 versus 0.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.12 versus 1.896

Comparer les références

CPU 1: AMD A10-4600M
CPU 2: AMD A10-4655M

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1078

909

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1938

1658

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

354

264

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

912

703

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.171

2.88

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

7.18

10.434

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.162

0.364

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

13.506

10.709

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.896

40.12

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1695

1371

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3279

3232

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1695

1371

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3279

3232

Nom	AMD A10-4600M	AMD A10-4655M
PassMark - Single thread mark	1078	909
PassMark - CPU mark	1938	1658
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	354	264
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	912	703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.171	2.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7.18	10.434
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.162	0.364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.506	10.709
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.896	40.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695	1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3279	3232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695	1371
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3279	3232

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD A10-4600M	AMD A10-4655M
Essentiel
Nom de code de l’architecture	Trinity	Trinity
Date de sortie	15 May 2012	15 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	2052	2053
Série	AMD A-Series	AMD A-Series
Segment vertical	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
Soutien de 64-bit
Taille de dé	246 mm	246 mm
Cache L1	192 KB	192 KB
Cache L2	4 MB	4096 KB
Processus de fabrication	32 nm	32 nm
Fréquence maximale	3.2 GHz	2.8 GHz
Nombre de noyaux	4	4
Nombre de fils	4	4
Compte de transistor	1303 Million	1303 Million
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase)		100 °C
Mémoire
Genres de mémoire soutenus	DDR3
Compatibilité
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration	1	1
Prise courants soutenu	FS1r2	FP2
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	25 Watt
Technologies élevé
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)