AMD A10-5700 vs AMD A8-5600K
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-5700 and AMD A8-5600K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5700
- 2.7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.704 vs 11.539
- 20.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.896 vs 3.45
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 916 vs 807
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1879 vs 1596
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 916 vs 807
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1879 vs 1596
Specifications (specs) | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 192 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.704 vs 11.539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.896 vs 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 916 vs 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1879 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 916 vs 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1879 vs 1596 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-5600K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2863 vs 2736
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 488 vs 477
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1366 vs 1266
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.39 vs 4.26
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.085 vs 8.674
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.213 vs 0.19
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6089 vs 3315
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6089 vs 3315
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1429 vs 1427 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2863 vs 2736 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 488 vs 477 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1366 vs 1266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.39 vs 4.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.085 vs 8.674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.213 vs 0.19 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6089 vs 3315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6089 vs 3315 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-5700
CPU 2: AMD A8-5600K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-5700 | AMD A8-5600K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1427 | 1429 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2736 | 2863 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 477 | 488 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1266 | 1366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.26 | 4.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.674 | 11.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.19 | 0.213 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.704 | 11.539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.896 | 3.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 916 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1879 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | 6089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 916 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1879 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 | 6089 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A10-5700 | AMD A8-5600K | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Trinity | Trinity |
Launch date | October 2012 | 26 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1730 | 1753 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 246 mm | 246 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 74 °C |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 1303 Million |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM2 | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |