AMD A10-9600P vs AMD A8-5550M
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9600P and AMD A8-5550M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9600P
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1150 vs 1032
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2342 vs 1852
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1003 vs 924
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.767 vs 10.477
- 20.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.119 vs 2.546
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 vs 634
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 vs 634
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 vs 12 March 2013 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 vs 1032 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2342 vs 1852 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 vs 924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.767 vs 10.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 vs 2.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 vs 634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 vs 634 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-5550M
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 369 vs 357
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.83 vs 2.935
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7.997 vs 5.264
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.148 vs 0.147
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2542 vs 1657
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6126 vs 5281
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2542 vs 1657
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6126 vs 5281
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 369 vs 357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.83 vs 2.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.997 vs 5.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 vs 0.147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2542 vs 1657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6126 vs 5281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2542 vs 1657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6126 vs 5281 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-9600P
CPU 2: AMD A8-5550M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-9600P | AMD A8-5550M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 | 1032 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2342 | 1852 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | 369 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 | 924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.935 | 3.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.264 | 7.997 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.147 | 0.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.767 | 10.477 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 | 2.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1657 | 2542 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5281 | 6126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1657 | 2542 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5281 | 6126 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A10-9600P | AMD A8-5550M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | Richland |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 12 March 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM960PADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1671 | 1710 |
| Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.4 GHz | |
| Die size | 250 mm | 246 mm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 3100 Million | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 720 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 6 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
| Sockets supported | FP4 | FS1r2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A10-9600P with others
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelCore i7-3610QE
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDA8-5550M
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDPRO A6-9500B
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelXeon E5-4648 v3
AMDA10-9600P vs
AMDA8-7050
AMDA10-9600P vs
IntelXeon E3-1284L v3
