AMD A10-9600P versus AMD A8-5550M
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-9600P et AMD A8-5550M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-9600P
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.3 GHz versus 3.1 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1150 versus 1032
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2342 versus 1852
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1003 versus 924
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.767 versus 10.477
- 20.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.119 versus 2.546
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 versus 634
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 634
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 versus 12 March 2013 |
Fréquence maximale | 3.3 GHz versus 3.1 GHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 versus 1032 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2342 versus 1852 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 versus 924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.767 versus 10.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 versus 2.546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 versus 634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 634 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-5550M
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 369 versus 357
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.83 versus 2.935
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7.997 versus 5.264
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.148 versus 0.147
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2542 versus 1657
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6126 versus 5281
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2542 versus 1657
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6126 versus 5281
Caractéristiques | |
Cache L2 | 4096 KB versus 2 MB |
Référence | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 369 versus 357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.83 versus 2.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.997 versus 5.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.148 versus 0.147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2542 versus 1657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6126 versus 5281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2542 versus 1657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6126 versus 5281 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-9600P
CPU 2: AMD A8-5550M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-9600P | AMD A8-5550M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 | 1032 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2342 | 1852 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | 369 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1003 | 924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.935 | 3.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.264 | 7.997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.147 | 0.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.767 | 10.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.119 | 2.546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1657 | 2542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5281 | 6126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1657 | 2542 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5281 | 6126 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-9600P | AMD A8-5550M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Bristol Ridge | Richland |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 | 12 March 2013 |
OPN Tray | AM960PADY44AB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1671 | 1710 |
Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A-Series |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.4 GHz | |
Taille de dé | 250 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 4096 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | 1178 million |
Ouvert | ||
Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 720 MHz | |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FS1r2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
AMD Secure technology | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |