AMD A10-9700 vs AMD FX-8350
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9700 and AMD FX-8350 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9700
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 61°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1619 vs 1582
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.497 vs 9.886
- 10.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.004 vs 21.912
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.533 vs 0.424
- 23.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.928 vs 1.199
- 12.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.933 vs 7.137
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 July 2017 vs 23 October 2012 |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C vs 61°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 vs 1582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.497 vs 9.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.004 vs 21.912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.533 vs 0.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.928 vs 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.933 vs 7.137 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8350
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6080 vs 3555
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 566 vs 493
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2751 vs 1465
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 2 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6080 vs 3555 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 566 vs 493 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2751 vs 1465 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-9700
CPU 2: AMD FX-8350
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 | 1582 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3555 | 6080 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | 566 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1465 | 2751 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 1334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.497 | 9.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.004 | 21.912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.533 | 0.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.928 | 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.933 | 7.137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7174 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A10-9700 | AMD FX-8350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | Vishera |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
Launch date | 27 July 2017 | 23 October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | |
OPN PIB | AD9700AGABBOX | FD8350FRHKBOX |
OPN Tray | AD9700AGM44AB | FD8350FRW8KHK |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 991 | 2541 |
Price now | $79.99 | $79.99 |
Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.04 | 32.95 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
Compute Cores | 10 | |
Die size | 246 mm | 315 mm |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 61°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 1200 Million |
Unlocked | ||
L1 cache | 384 KB | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | |
Number of threads | 8 | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 1029 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 6 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon R7 Series | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM4 | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 x8 | n / a |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |