AMD A4 PRO-3350B vs AMD C-50

Comparative analysis of AMD A4 PRO-3350B and AMD C-50 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4 PRO-3350B

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 140% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 245 vs 85
• 4.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 706 vs 158

Reasons to consider the AMD C-50

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 15 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4 PRO-3350B
CPU 2: AMD C-50

Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	245 85
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	706 158

Compare specifications (specs)