AMD A6-3410MX vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3410MX and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3410MX

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 23% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.87 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
• 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 732 vs 661
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1263 vs 548

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3410MX
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	732 661
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1263 548

Compare specifications (specs)