AMD E2-3800 vs AMD A6-3410MX

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3800 and AMD A6-3410MX processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3800

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3410MX

• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 732 vs 436
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1263 vs 1152
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 265 vs 156
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 800 vs 548

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3800
CPU 2: AMD A6-3410MX

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	436 732
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1152 1263
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	156 265
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	548 800

Compare specifications (specs)