AMD A6-3420M vs AMD E2-3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3420M and AMD E2-3000M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3420M

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 773 vs 731
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1294 vs 668

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3000M

• 4.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1174 vs 261
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1887 vs 788

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3420M
CPU 2: AMD E2-3000M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	773 731
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1294 668
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	261 1174
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	788 1887

Compare specifications (specs)