AMD A6-3420M vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3420M and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3420M

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 39% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.73 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
• 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400

• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 900 vs 261
• Around 88% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1481 vs 788

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3420M
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	261 900
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	788 1481

Compare specifications (specs)