AMD A6-3420M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3420M and Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3420M

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
  • 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 772 vs 768
  • Around 98% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1293 vs 652
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 June 2011 vs 1 October 2008
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 65 nm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 2048 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 772 vs 768
PassMark - CPU mark 1293 vs 652

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

  • 4.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1139 vs 261
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1795 vs 788
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1139 vs 261
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1795 vs 788

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3420M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
772
768
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1293
652
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
261
1139
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
788
1795
Name AMD A6-3420M Intel Core 2 Duo T5900
PassMark - Single thread mark 772 768
PassMark - CPU mark 1293 652
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 261 1139
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 788 1795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.581
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3961

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A6-3420M Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

Essentials

Architecture codename Llano Merom
Launch date 15 June 2011 1 October 2008
Place in performance rating 2272 2296
Series AMD A-Series Intel Core 2 Duo
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 218 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB
L2 cache 4096 KB 2048 KB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 65 nm
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Number of threads 4 2
Transistor count 1000 Million
Front-side bus (FSB) 800 MHz

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Sockets supported FS1 Socket P
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 35 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

Security & Reliability

Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Intel® Active Management technology (AMT)