AMD A6-4400M vs AMD A8-3500M

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-4400M and AMD A8-3500M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-4400M

• CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1027 vs 813
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 331 vs 250
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.341 vs 1.766
• 28.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 123.579 vs 4.312
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.338 vs 0.099
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.28 vs 8.056

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3500M

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 5.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1400 vs 1010
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 753 vs 484
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.745 vs 0.585
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 805 vs 496
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2610 vs 2268
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5455 vs 4945
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 805 vs 496
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2610 vs 2268
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5455 vs 4945

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-4400M
CPU 2: AMD A8-3500M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1027 813
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1010 1400
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	331 250
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	484 753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	3.341 1.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	123.579 4.312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.338 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	8.28 8.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	0.585 1.745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	496 805
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2268 2610
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	4945 5455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	496 805
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	2268 2610
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	4945 5455

Compare specifications (specs)