AMD A6-9220 vs AMD E2-9000
Comparative analysis of AMD A6-9220 and AMD E2-9000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9220
- Around 32% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1131 vs 816
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1278 vs 967
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 743 vs 514
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1537 vs 1227
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4038 vs 3313
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 743 vs 514
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1537 vs 1227
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4038 vs 3313
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1131 vs 816 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1278 vs 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 743 vs 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1537 vs 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4038 vs 3313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 743 vs 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1537 vs 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4038 vs 3313 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E2-9000
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A6-9220
CPU 2: AMD E2-9000
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A6-9220 | AMD E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1131 | 816 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1278 | 967 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.825 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.467 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.364 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 743 | 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1537 | 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4038 | 3313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 743 | 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1537 | 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4038 | 3313 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A6-9220 | AMD E2-9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 1 June 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AM9220AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1870 | 1899 |
| Series | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops | Bristol Ridge |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.5 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Die size | 124.5 mm | 124.5 mm |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 90 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1200 Million | 1200 Million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics max frequency | 655 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 3 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Sockets supported | FP4 BGA | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A6-9220 with others
AMDA6-9220 vs
IntelXeon E5-2658
AMDA6-9220 vs
AMDPro A6-8500B
AMDA6-9220 vs
AMDE2-9000
AMDA6-9220 vs
IntelXeon E5-2608L v3
AMDA6-9220 vs
IntelCore i3-4330TE
AMDA6-9220 vs
AMD3015Ce
