AMD A6-9220 versus AMD E2-9000
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A6-9220 et AMD E2-9000 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-9220
- Environ 32% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.9 GHz versus 2.2 GHz
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1129 versus 823
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1274 versus 976
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 743 versus 514
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1537 versus 1227
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4038 versus 3313
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 743 versus 514
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1537 versus 1227
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4038 versus 3313
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.9 GHz versus 2.2 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1129 versus 823 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1274 versus 976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 743 versus 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1537 versus 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4038 versus 3313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 743 versus 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1537 versus 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4038 versus 3313 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E2-9000
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 15 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A6-9220
CPU 2: AMD E2-9000
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A6-9220 | AMD E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1129 | 823 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1274 | 976 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.825 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.467 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.364 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 743 | 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1537 | 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4038 | 3313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 743 | 514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1537 | 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4038 | 3313 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A6-9220 | AMD E2-9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 | 1 June 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AM9220AYN23AC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1801 | 1824 |
| Série | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops | Bristol Ridge |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.5 GHz | |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Taille de dé | 124.5 mm | 124.5 mm |
| Cache L1 | 160 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 Million | 1200 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 17.1 GB/s | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 655 MHz | |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 3 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 10-15 Watt | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4 BGA | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A6-9220 avec des autres
AMDA6-9220 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 X620 BE
AMDA6-9220 vs
IntelCore i7-2715QE
AMDA6-9220 vs
AMDPro A6-8500B
AMDA6-9220 vs
AMDE2-9000
AMDA6-9220 vs
IntelPentium G3320TE
AMDA6-9220 vs
IntelCore i3-7102E
