AMD A6-9225 vs AMD A10-5750M

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-9225 and AMD A10-5750M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-9225

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 583
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 583
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 754 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 754 vs 583

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5750M

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 35% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2053 vs 1338
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2277 vs 1522
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2277 vs 1522
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7416 vs 4199
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7416 vs 4199
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.441 vs 1.391
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 1 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1165 vs 1161
PassMark - CPU mark 2053 vs 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2277 vs 1522
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2277 vs 1522
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7416 vs 4199
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7416 vs 4199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.441 vs 1.391

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-9225
CPU 2: AMD A10-5750M

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1161
1165
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1338
2053
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
754
583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
754
583
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1522
2277
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1522
2277
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4199
7416
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4199
7416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.391
3.441
Name AMD A6-9225 AMD A10-5750M
PassMark - Single thread mark 1161 1165
PassMark - CPU mark 1338 2053
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 754 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 754 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1522 2277
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1522 2277
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4199 7416
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4199 7416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.391 3.441
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 405
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.908

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A6-9225 AMD A10-5750M

Essentials

Family AMD A-Series Processors
Launch date Q2 2018 12 March 2013
OPN Tray AM9225AYN23AC
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in performance rating 1660 1615
Series AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops AMD A-Series
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop
Architecture codename Richland

Performance

Base frequency 3.1 GHz
Compute Cores 5
L2 cache 1 MB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Number of GPU cores 3
Unlocked
64 bit support
Die size 246 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core)
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 71 °C
Number of threads 4
Transistor count 1178 million

Memory

Max memory channels 1
Supported memory frequency 2133 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 686 MHz
Processor graphics AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Compatibility

Configurable TDP 10-15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Sockets supported FS1r2

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 3.0

Advanced Technologies

Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS)
AMD App Acceleration
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)