AMD A8-5500 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-5500 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-5500
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1333 vs 993
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2610 vs 1782
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 455 vs 320
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1243 vs 1006
- 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.063 vs 0.501
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.185 vs 0.111
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2012 vs August 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1333 vs 993 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2610 vs 1782 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 455 vs 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1243 vs 1006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.063 vs 0.501 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 vs 0.111 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.702 vs 8.685
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.035 vs 0.504
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.688 vs 3.038
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 vs 8.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 vs 0.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 vs 3.038 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-5500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-5500 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1333 | 993 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2610 | 1782 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 455 | 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1243 | 1006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.063 | 0.501 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.685 | 16.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 | 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.504 | 1.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.038 | 3.688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 789 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 789 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4729 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A8-5500 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Trinity | Yorkfield |
Launch date | October 2012 | August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1959 | 3129 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $22.99 | |
Processor Number | Q8200 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 36.05 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 246 mm | 164 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 71 °C |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 456 million |
Base frequency | 2.33 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM2 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring |