AMD A8-7410 vs AMD E2-3800

Comparative analysis of AMD A8-7410 and AMD E2-3800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD A8-7410

vs

AMD E2-3800

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-7410

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 802 vs 437
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1821 vs 1160
• Around 68% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 262 vs 156
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 781 vs 548
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 661 vs 449
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1234 vs 769
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3706 vs 1691
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 661 vs 449
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1234 vs 769
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3706 vs 1691

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A8-7410
CPU 2: AMD E2-3800

Compare specifications (specs)