AMD A8-7410 vs AMD E2-3800
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A8-7410 und AMD E2-3800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-7410
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 802 vs 437
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1821 vs 1160
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 262 vs 156
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 781 vs 548
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 661 vs 449
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1234 vs 769
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3706 vs 1691
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 661 vs 449
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1234 vs 769
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3706 vs 1691
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 7 May 2015 vs 2 November 2013 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 802 vs 437 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1821 vs 1160 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 262 vs 156 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 781 vs 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 661 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1234 vs 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3706 vs 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 661 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1234 vs 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3706 vs 1691 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A8-7410
CPU 2: AMD E2-3800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A8-7410 | AMD E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 802 | 437 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1821 | 1160 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 262 | 156 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 781 | 548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.521 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.553 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.317 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 661 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1234 | 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3706 | 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 661 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1234 | 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3706 | 1691 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A8-7410 | AMD E2-3800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Carrizo-L | Kabini |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD E-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 7 May 2015 | 2 November 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM7410JBY44JB | EM3800IBJ44HM |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2271 | 2729 |
| Serie | AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 930 Million | |
| Freigegeben | ||
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 1 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L | DDR3 |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 847 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8280 |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| iGPU Kernzahl | 128 | |
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 128 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FT3 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A8-7410 mit anderen
AMDA8-7410 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T1400
AMDA8-7410 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T5900
AMDA8-7410 vs
AMDE2-3000M
AMDA8-7410 vs
AMDA6-3420M
AMDA8-7410 vs
AMDA6-9220C
AMDA8-7410 vs
IntelAtom x5-E3940
