AMD A9-9410 vs AMD FX-9800P
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9410 and AMD FX-9800P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9410
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10-25/25 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1342 vs 1246
- 5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1817 vs 364
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2686 vs 1013
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.735 vs 11.369
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5532 vs 3977
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5532 vs 3977
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1342 vs 1246 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 vs 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 vs 1013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 vs 11.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 vs 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 vs 3977 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9800P
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2554 vs 1524
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.106 vs 2.294
- 19.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 92.287 vs 4.731
- 16.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 35.16 vs 2.184
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 922
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1219 vs 1061
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 922
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1219 vs 1061
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2554 vs 1524 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.106 vs 2.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 92.287 vs 4.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 35.16 vs 2.184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 vs 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1219 vs 1061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 vs 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1219 vs 1061 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9410
CPU 2: AMD FX-9800P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9410 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1342 | 1246 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1524 | 2554 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 | 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 | 1013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.294 | 8.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.731 | 92.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 | 11.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.184 | 35.16 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1061 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 | 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1061 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 | 3977 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A9-9410 | AMD FX-9800P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 1 June 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AM9410AFY23AC | FM980PADY44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 1667 | 1694 |
| Series | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | AMD FX-Series Processors for Laptops |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Die size | 124.5 mm | 250 mm |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1200 Million | 3100 Million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 758 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 3 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A9-9410 with others
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDFX-9800P
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDRyzen 5 3550H
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron G3900TE
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMD3020e
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron J6412
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron G6900TE
