AMD A9-9410 vs AMD FX-9800P
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A9-9410 und AMD FX-9800P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A9-9410
- Etwa 50% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 10-25/25 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1334 vs 1229
- 5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1817 vs 364
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2686 vs 1013
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.735 vs 11.369
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5532 vs 3977
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5532 vs 3977
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1334 vs 1229 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 vs 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 vs 1013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 vs 11.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 vs 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 vs 3977 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FX-9800P
- 2 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 4 vs 2
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2562 vs 1528
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.106 vs 2.294
- 19.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 92.287 vs 4.731
- 16.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 35.16 vs 2.184
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 922
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1219 vs 1061
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 922
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1219 vs 1061
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 vs 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2562 vs 1528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.106 vs 2.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 92.287 vs 4.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 35.16 vs 2.184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 vs 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1219 vs 1061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 vs 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1219 vs 1061 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A9-9410
CPU 2: AMD FX-9800P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9410 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1334 | 1229 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1528 | 2562 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 | 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 | 1013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.294 | 8.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.731 | 92.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 | 11.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.184 | 35.16 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1061 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 | 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1061 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 | 3977 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A9-9410 | AMD FX-9800P | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Stoney Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2016 | 1 June 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AM9410AFY23AC | FM980PADY44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1735 | 1770 |
| Serie | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | AMD FX-Series Processors for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Matrizengröße | 124.5 mm | 250 mm |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1200 Million | 3100 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | 758 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 3 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A9-9410 mit anderen
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 N640
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCore i7-3517UE
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDFX-9800P
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDAthlon Silver 3050e
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron J6412
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron G6900TE
