AMD A9-9410 versus AMD FX-9800P
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A9-9410 et AMD FX-9800P pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9410
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10-25/25 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1342 versus 1246
- 5x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1817 versus 364
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2686 versus 1013
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.735 versus 11.369
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5532 versus 3977
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5532 versus 3977
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1342 versus 1246 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 versus 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 versus 1013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 versus 11.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 versus 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 versus 3977 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FX-9800P
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.6 GHz versus 3.5 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2554 versus 1524
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.106 versus 2.294
- 19.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 92.287 versus 4.731
- 16.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 35.16 versus 2.184
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 versus 922
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1219 versus 1061
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 versus 922
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1219 versus 1061
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz versus 3.5 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2554 versus 1524 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.106 versus 2.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 92.287 versus 4.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 35.16 versus 2.184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 versus 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1219 versus 1061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 versus 922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1219 versus 1061 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A9-9410
CPU 2: AMD FX-9800P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A9-9410 | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1342 | 1246 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1524 | 2554 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1817 | 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2686 | 1013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.294 | 8.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.731 | 92.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.108 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.735 | 11.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.184 | 35.16 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 922 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1061 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5532 | 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 922 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1061 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5532 | 3977 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A9-9410 | AMD FX-9800P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 | 1 June 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AM9410AFY23AC | FM980PADY44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1666 | 1694 |
| Série | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops | AMD FX-Series Processors for Laptops |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 5 | |
| Taille de dé | 124.5 mm | 250 mm |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 3 | 8 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 Million | 3100 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 3 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10-25/25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A9-9410 avec des autres
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDFX-9800P
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMDRyzen 5 3550H
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron G3900TE
AMDA9-9410 vs
AMD3020e
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron J6412
AMDA9-9410 vs
IntelCeleron G6900TE
