AMD A9-9430 vs AMD A10-6700T
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9430 and AMD A10-6700T processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9430
- Around 99900% higher clock speed: 3500 MHz vs 3.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.568 vs 4.788
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.688 vs 0.601
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.424 vs 15.083
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3500 MHz vs 3.5 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 vs 4.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 vs 0.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 vs 15.083 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6700T
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 20% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 230.34 vs 142.793
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.56 vs 38.08
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 192 KB vs 160 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 230.34 vs 142.793 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.56 vs 38.08 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9430
CPU 2: AMD A10-6700T
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD A9-9430 | AMD A10-6700T |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 | 4.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 | 230.34 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 | 0.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 | 15.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.08 | 59.56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 830 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 830 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1290 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2299 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1957 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4423 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A9-9430 | AMD A10-6700T | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Richland |
Family | AMD A9-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
Place in performance rating | 1383 | 1380 |
Processor Number | A9-9430 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch date | September 2013 | |
OPN PIB | AD670TYHHLBOX | |
OPN Tray | AD670TYHA44HL | |
Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3200 MHz | 2.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 160 KB | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum frequency | 3500 MHz | 3.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Die size | 246 mm | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 71.30°C | |
Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
Processor graphics | Radeon R5 series | AMD Radeon HD 8650D |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 720 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 384 | |
Number of pipelines | 384 | |
Switchable graphics | ||
Compatibility |
||
Package Size | micro-BGA | |
Sockets supported | BGA (FT4) | FM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 45 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 11 |