AMD Athlon 64 1500+ vs AMD Turion 64 ML-42
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 1500+ and AMD Turion 64 ML-42 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 1500+
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt
Launch date | November 2005 vs October 2005 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 ML-42
- Around 140% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1 GHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 1500+
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-42
Name | AMD Athlon 64 1500+ | AMD Turion 64 ML-42 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 455 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 400 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 1500+ | AMD Turion 64 ML-42 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Venice | Lancaster |
Launch date | November 2005 | October 2005 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3067 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Series | Turion 64 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 84 mm | 125 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 69 million | 114 million |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Number of threads | 1 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 754 | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 35 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow |