AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 vs AMD Opteron 246 HE
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 and AMD Opteron 246 HE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 55 Watt
Launch date | May 2008 vs February 2004 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 246 HE
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 246 HE
Name | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 | AMD Opteron 246 HE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 428 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 416 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1660 | AMD Opteron 246 HE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Lima | SledgeHammer |
Launch date | May 2008 | February 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 3114 | not rated |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 77 mm | 193 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 122 million | 106 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | 940 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 55 Watt |