AMD Athlon II X2 240 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X2 240 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X2 240
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 618 vs 612
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.699 vs 0.322
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2009 vs January 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.67 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 618 vs 612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.699 vs 0.322 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1144 vs 1080
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1124 vs 1042
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 368 vs 338
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.206 vs 4.009
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.1 vs 0.093
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.463 vs 1.779
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 2048 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1144 vs 1080 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1124 vs 1042 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 368 vs 338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.206 vs 4.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 vs 0.093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.463 vs 1.779 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X2 240 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1080 | 1144 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1042 | 1124 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 | 368 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 618 | 612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.699 | 0.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.009 | 27.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 | 0.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.779 | 2.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X2 240 | Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Regor | Wolfdale |
Launch date | July 2009 | January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $35 | |
Place in performance rating | 3099 | 3095 |
Price now | $15.99 | $49.99 |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.24 | 11.13 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | E8200 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 117 mm | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 6144 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 72.4°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |