AMD Athlon II X4 640 vs AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X4 640 and AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 640
- CPU is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
Launch date | May 2010 vs April 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1452 vs 1212
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3797 vs 2262
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 460 vs 358
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1974 vs 1191
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.141 vs 2.776
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.825 vs 7.618
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.312 vs 0.17
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.417 vs 4.052
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1452 vs 1212 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3797 vs 2262 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 460 vs 358 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1974 vs 1191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.141 vs 2.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.825 vs 7.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 vs 0.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.417 vs 4.052 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X4 640
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon II X4 640 | AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1212 | 1452 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2262 | 3797 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 358 | 460 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1191 | 1974 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.776 | 6.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.618 | 16.825 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.17 | 0.312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.052 | 5.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.606 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon II X4 640 | AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Propus | Thuban |
Launch date | May 2010 | April 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Place in performance rating | 3034 | 2826 |
Price now | $239.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.07 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 169 mm | 346 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
Transistor count | 300 million | 904 million |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |