AMD Athlon XP 2700+ vs AMD Athlon 900
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 2700+ and AMD Athlon 900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 2700+
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 141% higher clock speed: 2.17 GHz vs 0.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 130 nm vs 180 nm
Launch date | October 2002 vs June 2000 |
Maximum frequency | 2.17 GHz vs 0.9 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 180 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 900
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 68 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 2700+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 900
Name | AMD Athlon XP 2700+ | AMD Athlon 900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 398 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 256 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon XP 2700+ | AMD Athlon 900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thoroughbred | Thunderbird |
Launch date | October 2002 | June 2000 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | |
Place in performance rating | 3162 | not rated |
Price now | $84.79 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.36 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Die size | 80 mm | 120 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 180 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.17 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 37 million | 37 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 50 Watt |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 |