AMD Athlon XP 2800+ vs AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 2800+ and AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 2800+
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 77 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt vs 77 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 3200+
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 2.08 GHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 430 vs 408
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 281 vs 260
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 2.08 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 430 vs 408 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 281 vs 260 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 2800+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon XP 2800+ | AMD Athlon XP 3200+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 408 | 430 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 260 | 281 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon XP 2800+ | AMD Athlon XP 3200+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Barton | Barton |
Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 3135 | 3108 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Die size | 101 mm | 101 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.08 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 63 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 77 Watt |