AMD Athlon XP 3100+ vs AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 3100+ and AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 3100+
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 77 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | December 2003 vs January 2001 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt vs 77 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 431 vs 430 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 282 vs 281 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 3200+
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 3100+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon XP 3100+ | AMD Athlon XP 3200+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 431 | 430 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 282 | 281 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon XP 3100+ | AMD Athlon XP 3200+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thorton | Barton |
Launch date | December 2003 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 3103 | 3106 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 63 million | 63 million |
Die size | 101 mm | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 77 Watt |