AMD C-50 vs AMD Mobile Sempron 200U
Comparative analysis of AMD C-50 and AMD Mobile Sempron 200U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD C-50
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 261 vs 125
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 vs 16 January 2009 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 256 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 261 vs 125 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron 200U
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 8 Watt vs 9 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 311 vs 309
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 Watt vs 9 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 311 vs 309 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD C-50
CPU 2: AMD Mobile Sempron 200U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD C-50 | AMD Mobile Sempron 200U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 309 | 311 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 261 | 125 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 85 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.033 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.288 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1102 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1102 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD C-50 | AMD Mobile Sempron 200U | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ontario | Huron |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 | 16 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 3235 | 3238 |
Series | AMD C-Series | AMD Mobile Sempron |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 1 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Number of threads | 2 | 1 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1600 MHz | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | ASB1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 8 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |