AMD C-50 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Comparative analysis of AMD C-50 and Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD C-50
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 10 Watt
Launch date | 9 November 2010 vs 1 September 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 10 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
- Around 30% higher clock speed: 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 177 vs 85
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 309 vs 158
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz |
L2 cache | 3 MB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 177 vs 85 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 309 vs 158 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD C-50
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD C-50 | Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 309 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 261 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 85 | 177 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 158 | 309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.033 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.288 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1102 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 150 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1102 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD C-50 | Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ontario | Penryn |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 | 1 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 3235 | 3290 |
Series | AMD C-Series | Intel Core 2 Duo |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 107 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 3 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Transistor count | 410 Million | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | BGA956 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 10 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |