Intel Atom E3815 vs AMD C-50
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom E3815 and AMD C-50 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E3815
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher clock speed: 1.46 GHz vs 1 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 9 Watt
| Launch date | October 2013 vs 9 November 2010 |
| Maximum frequency | 1.46 GHz vs 1 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 9 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD C-50
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 309 vs 266
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 261 vs 184
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 309 vs 266 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 261 vs 184 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom E3815
CPU 2: AMD C-50
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom E3815 | AMD C-50 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 266 | 309 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 184 | 261 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 85 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.444 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.033 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.288 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.042 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 150 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1102 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 150 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 478 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1102 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom E3815 | AMD C-50 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Ontario |
| Launch date | October 2013 | 9 November 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3258 | 3235 |
| Price now | $209.99 | |
| Processor Number | E3815 | |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor E Series | AMD C-Series |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.46 | |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.46 GHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | -40°C to 110°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.46 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 1 | 2 |
| Die size | 75 mm | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1067 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 400 MHz | |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 9 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | x4, x2, x1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0, 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom E3815 with others
IntelAtom E3815 vs
IntelAtom N280
IntelAtom E3815 vs
IntelCeleron M 900
IntelAtom E3815 vs
IntelAtom C2338
