AMD E1-6010 vs AMD E-300

Comparative analysis of AMD E1-6010 and AMD E-300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6010

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 427 vs 395
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 538 vs 338
  • Around 37% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 142 vs 104
  • Around 34% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 250 vs 186
  • 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.155 vs 0.502
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 11.178 vs 4.83
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 377 vs 250
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 877 vs 754
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2018 vs 1461
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 377 vs 250
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 877 vs 754
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2018 vs 1461
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 April 2014 vs 22 August 2011
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 427 vs 395
PassMark - CPU mark 538 vs 338
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 142 vs 104
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 250 vs 186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.155 vs 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 11.178 vs 4.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 377 vs 250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 877 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2018 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 377 vs 250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 877 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2018 vs 1461

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E1-6010
CPU 2: AMD E-300

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
427
395
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
538
338
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
142
104
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
250
186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2.155
0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
11.178
4.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
377
250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
877
754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2018
1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
377
250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
877
754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2018
1461
Name AMD E1-6010 AMD E-300
PassMark - Single thread mark 427 395
PassMark - CPU mark 538 338
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 142 104
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 250 186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.155 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 62.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 11.178 4.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 377 250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 877 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2018 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 377 250
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 877 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2018 1461

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD E1-6010 AMD E-300

Essentials

Architecture codename Beema Zacate
Family AMD E-Series Processors
Launch date 29 April 2014 22 August 2011
OPN Tray EM6010IUJ23JB
Place in performance rating 2768 3013
Series AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops AMD E-Series
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.35 GHz
L2 cache 1 MB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Unlocked
Die size 75 mm
L1 cache 128 KB
Maximum frequency 1.3 GHz

Memory

Max memory channels 1
Supported memory types DDR3L-1333 DDR3

Graphics

Enduro
Processor graphics AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Compatibility

Sockets supported FT3b FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 2.0

Advanced Technologies

AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
PowerGating
PowerNow
System Image Stability
VirusProtect

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0