AMD E2-1800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-1800 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-1800

  • CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
  • Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.125 vs 0.273
  • Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.303 vs 21.747
  • Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.132 vs 0.082
  • 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.223 vs 0.586
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.909 vs 2.055
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 March 2012 vs 10 January 2008
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.125 vs 0.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 30.303 vs 21.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.132 vs 0.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.223 vs 0.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.909 vs 2.055

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

  • Around 53% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz
  • 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1074 vs 525
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1046 vs 447
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 vs 138
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 650 vs 247
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz
L2 cache 6144 KB vs 1024 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1074 vs 525
PassMark - CPU mark 1046 vs 447
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 357 vs 138
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 650 vs 247

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-1800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
525
1074
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
447
1046
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
138
357
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
247
650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.125
0.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
30.303
21.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.132
0.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2.223
0.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
5.909
2.055
Name AMD E2-1800 Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
PassMark - Single thread mark 525 1074
PassMark - CPU mark 447 1046
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 138 357
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 247 650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.125 0.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 30.303 21.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.132 0.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 2.223 0.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 5.909 2.055
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1099

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD E2-1800 Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

Essentials

Architecture codename Zacate Penryn
Launch date 20 March 2012 10 January 2008
Place in performance rating 3051 3139
Series AMD E-Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Vertical segment Laptop Mobile
Launch price (MSRP) $530
Processor Number T9500
Status Discontinued

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 75 mm 107 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 6144 KB
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 45 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 100 °C
Maximum frequency 1.7 GHz 2.6 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Base frequency 2.60 GHz
Bus Speed 800 MHz FSB
Front-side bus (FSB) 800 MHz
Maximum core temperature 105°C
Transistor count 410 million
VID voltage range 1.000V-1.250V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Sockets supported FT1 BGA 413-Ball BGA479, PPGA478, PGA478
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 35mm x 35mm

Advanced Technologies

PowerNow
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)