AMD E2-1800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
Comparative analysis of AMD E2-1800 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E2-1800
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.125 vs 0.273
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.303 vs 21.747
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.132 vs 0.082
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.223 vs 0.586
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.909 vs 2.055
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 March 2012 vs 10 January 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.125 vs 0.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.303 vs 21.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.132 vs 0.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.223 vs 0.586 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.909 vs 2.055 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
- Around 53% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1074 vs 525
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1046 vs 449
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 vs 138
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 650 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1074 vs 525 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1046 vs 449 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 vs 138 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 650 vs 247 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E2-1800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD E2-1800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 525 | 1074 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 449 | 1046 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 138 | 357 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 247 | 650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.125 | 0.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.303 | 21.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.132 | 0.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.223 | 0.586 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.909 | 2.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1099 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1099 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E2-1800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zacate | Penryn |
Launch date | 20 March 2012 | 10 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3055 | 3129 |
Series | AMD E-Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | |
Processor Number | T9500 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 6144 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 1.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
Transistor count | 410 million | |
VID voltage range | 1.000V-1.250V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | BGA479, PPGA478, PGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |