AMD E2-3200 vs AMD Athlon X2 7550

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3200 and AMD Athlon X2 7550 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3200

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 971 vs 934
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 968 vs 900
Specifications (specs)
Launch date September 2011 vs December 2008
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 971 vs 934
PassMark - CPU mark 968 vs 900

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 7550

  • Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1446 vs 1401
  • Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2427 vs 2253
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1446 vs 1401
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 2427 vs 2253

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3200
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 7550

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
971
934
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
968
900
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1401
1446
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
2253
2427
Name AMD E2-3200 AMD Athlon X2 7550
PassMark - Single thread mark 971 934
PassMark - CPU mark 968 900
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1401 1446
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 2253 2427

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD E2-3200 AMD Athlon X2 7550

Essentials

Architecture codename Llano Kuma
Launch date September 2011 December 2008
Place in performance rating 2002 1996
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 228 mm 285 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 65 nm
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz 2.5 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Transistor count 1178 million 450 million
L3 cache 2048 KB (shared)

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FM1 AM2+
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)