AMD E2-3800 vs Intel Pentium SU2700

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3800 and Intel Pentium SU2700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3800

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• 3 more threads: 4 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 5.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1160 vs 228

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium SU2700

• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 480 vs 437
• 5.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 849 vs 156
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 802 vs 548

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3800
CPU 2: Intel Pentium SU2700

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	437 480
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1160 228
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	156 849
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	548 802

Compare specifications (specs)