AMD E1-6010 vs AMD E2-3800
Comparative analysis of AMD E1-6010 and AMD E2-3800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6010
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 877 vs 769
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2018 vs 1691
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 877 vs 769
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2018 vs 1691
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 April 2014 vs 2 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 877 vs 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2018 vs 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 877 vs 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2018 vs 1691 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3800
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 437 vs 427
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1160 vs 538
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 156 vs 142
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 548 vs 250
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 449 vs 377
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 449 vs 377
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 437 vs 427 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1160 vs 538 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 156 vs 142 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 548 vs 250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 449 vs 377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 449 vs 377 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E1-6010
CPU 2: AMD E2-3800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E1-6010 | AMD E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 427 | 437 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 538 | 1160 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 142 | 156 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 250 | 548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.689 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.178 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 377 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 877 | 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2018 | 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 377 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 877 | 769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2018 | 1691 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD E1-6010 | AMD E2-3800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Beema | Kabini |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | AMD E-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 29 April 2014 | 2 November 2013 |
| OPN Tray | EM6010IUJ23JB | EM3800IBJ44HM |
| Place in performance rating | 2768 | 2729 |
| Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.35 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Unlocked | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8280 |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 450 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 128 | |
| Number of pipelines | 128 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FT3b | FT3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
