AMD E2-3800 vs AMD Phenom II X4 P920

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3800 and AMD Phenom II X4 P920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3800

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1152 vs 1006

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 P920

• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 597 vs 436
• 6.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1029 vs 156
• 5.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2866 vs 548

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3800
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 P920

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	436 597
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1152 1006
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	156 1029
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	548 2866

Compare specifications (specs)