AMD E2-3800 vs AMD Turion II P560

Comparative analysis of AMD E2-3800 and AMD Turion II P560 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-3800

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1152 vs 878

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II P560

• 2.1x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1001 vs 436
• Around 93% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 301 vs 156
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 558 vs 548

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E2-3800
CPU 2: AMD Turion II P560

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	436 1001
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1152 878
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	156 301
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	548 558

Compare specifications (specs)