AMD EPYC 7252 vs AMD A8-6500

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7252 and AMD A8-6500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7252

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• 12 more threads: 16 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm, 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 2.7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1948 vs 1475
• 11.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 32437 vs 2828

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-6500

• Around 28% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
• Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 120 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7252
CPU 2: AMD A8-6500

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1948 1475
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	32437 2828

Compare specifications (specs)