AMD FX-8320 vs AMD Phenom II X2 B55
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8320 and AMD Phenom II X2 B55 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8320
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1467 vs 1201
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5444 vs 1183
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.459 vs 3.707
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 22.798 vs 10.41
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.434 vs 0.191
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 0.318
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.54 vs 3.556
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2012 vs October 2009 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 4 GHz vs 3 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1467 vs 1201 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5444 vs 1183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.459 vs 3.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.798 vs 10.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.434 vs 0.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 vs 0.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.54 vs 3.556 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X2 B55
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1851 vs 524
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2854 vs 2495
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1851 vs 524 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2854 vs 2495 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-8320
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X2 B55
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-8320 | AMD Phenom II X2 B55 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1467 | 1201 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5444 | 1183 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 524 | 1851 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2495 | 2854 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.459 | 3.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.798 | 10.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.434 | 0.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 0.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.54 | 3.556 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-8320 | AMD Phenom II X2 B55 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Vishera | Callisto |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | October 2012 | October 2009 |
OPN PIB | FD8320FRHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8320FRW8KHK | |
Place in performance rating | 2496 | 2503 |
Price now | $92.50 | $48 |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | 11.85 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $48 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | |
Die size | 315 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 61.10°C | |
Maximum frequency | 4 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 2 |
Number of threads | 8 | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 758 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 80 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | n / a | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |