AMD Mobile Sempron 200U vs AMD Mobile Sempron 210U
Comparative analysis of AMD Mobile Sempron 200U and AMD Mobile Sempron 210U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron 200U
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 8 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 311 vs 299
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 311 vs 299 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron 210U
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 1.5 GHz vs 1 GHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 267 vs 125
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz vs 1 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 267 vs 125 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Mobile Sempron 200U
CPU 2: AMD Mobile Sempron 210U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Mobile Sempron 200U | AMD Mobile Sempron 210U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 311 | 299 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 125 | 267 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Mobile Sempron 200U | AMD Mobile Sempron 210U | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Huron | |
Launch date | 16 January 2009 | 16 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 3239 | 3240 |
Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | AMD Mobile Sempron |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Number of threads | 1 | 1 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | ASB1 | 812-ball BGA |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 Watt | 15 Watt |