AMD Mobile Sempron M100 vs AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

Comparative analysis of AMD Mobile Sempron M100 and AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron M100

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 32 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1102 vs 969

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 618 vs 546
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 506 vs 332
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1759 vs 1051

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Mobile Sempron M100
CPU 2: AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	546 618
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	332 506
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1102 969
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1051 1759

Compare specifications (specs)