AMD Opteron 4240 vs AMD Opteron 4256 EE
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 4240 and AMD Opteron 4256 EE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 4240
- Around 36% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- Around 10% higher maximum core temperature: 70.50°C vs 64°C
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 70.50°C vs 64°C |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 4256 EE
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
- 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 6 |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 288 KB |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 6 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron 4240 | AMD Opteron 4256 EE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Family | AMD Opteron | AMD Opteron |
OPN Tray | OS4240WLU6KGU | OS4256HJU8KGU |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Series | AMD Opteron 4200 Series Processor | AMD Opteron 4200 Series Processor |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 288 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70.50°C | 64°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
Number of threads | 6 | 8 |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | C32 | C32 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |