AMD Opteron X2 285 vs AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 285 and AMD Athlon 64 3700+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 285
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Launch date | March 2006 vs May 2004 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3700+
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 285
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Name | AMD Opteron X2 285 | AMD Athlon 64 3700+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 435 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 394 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1018 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 979 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron X2 285 | AMD Athlon 64 3700+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Italy | San Diego |
Launch date | March 2006 | May 2004 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 2666 |
Vertical segment | Server | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
Price now | $69 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.56 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 233 million | 105 million |
Die size | 115 mm | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 940 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 89 Watt |