AMD Opteron X2 285 vs AMD Athlon 64 3700+

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 285 and AMD Athlon 64 3700+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 285

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
  • Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Launch date March 2006 vs May 2004
Number of cores 2 vs 1
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 vs 1

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3700+

  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 285
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3700+

Name AMD Opteron X2 285 AMD Athlon 64 3700+
PassMark - Single thread mark 435
PassMark - CPU mark 394
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1018
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 979

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron X2 285 AMD Athlon 64 3700+

Essentials

Architecture codename Italy San Diego
Launch date March 2006 May 2004
Place in performance rating not rated 2666
Vertical segment Server Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $69
Price now $69
Value for money (0-100) 2.56

Performance

64 bit support
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 2 1
Transistor count 233 million 105 million
Die size 115 mm

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 1
Sockets supported 940 939
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 89 Watt