AMD Opteron X2 875 vs AMD Opteron 150
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 875 and AMD Opteron 150 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 875
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
Launch date | September 2005 vs August 2005 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 vs 1 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 150
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 95 Watt
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 875
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 150
Name | AMD Opteron X2 875 | AMD Opteron 150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 471 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron X2 875 | AMD Opteron 150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Egypt | Venus |
Launch date | September 2005 | August 2005 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3042 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 233 million | 106 million |
Die size | 193 mm | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 940 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 85 Watt |