AMD Opteron X2 875 vs AMD Opteron 150
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron X2 875 and AMD Opteron 150 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron X2 875
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
| Launch date | September 2005 vs August 2005 |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 vs 1 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 150
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron X2 875
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 150
| Name | AMD Opteron X2 875 | AMD Opteron 150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 471 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron X2 875 | AMD Opteron 150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Egypt | Venus |
| Launch date | September 2005 | August 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 3052 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 233 million | 106 million |
| Die size | 193 mm | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 940 | 939 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 85 Watt |