AMD PRO A10-9700E vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A10-9700E and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A10-9700E
- Around 32% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 68°C
- 5.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 248.331 vs 60.995
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.505 vs 3.322
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.999 vs 26.299
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C vs 68°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 vs 60.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 vs 3.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 vs 26.299 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 4
- Around 14% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2275 vs 1431
- 9.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 27681 vs 2997
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 979 vs 493
- 7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 10462 vs 1490
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.348 vs 15.113
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.579 vs 1.246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 July 2017 vs 3 October 2016 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 16 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 8 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2275 vs 1431 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 27681 vs 2997 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 979 vs 493 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 10462 vs 1490 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.348 vs 15.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.579 vs 1.246 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-9700E
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A10-9700E | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1431 | 2275 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2997 | 27681 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 493 | 979 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1490 | 10462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.113 | 20.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 248.331 | 60.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.246 | 1.579 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.505 | 3.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.999 | 26.299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1368 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1368 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4350 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7423 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD PRO A10-9700E | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Launch date | 3 October 2016 | 31 July 2017 |
| OPN Tray | AD970BAHM44AB | YD195XA8UGAAE |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 1244 | 1250 |
| Series | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture codename | Zen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| OPN PIB | YD195XA8AEWOF | |
| Price now | $652.56 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.96 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 68°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 16 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 213 mm | |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB | |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | |
| Number of threads | 32 | |
| Transistor count | 9600 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2667 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 847 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | R7 | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | AM4 | sTR4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD PRO A10-9700E with others
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDA10-6790K
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelCore i5-6600
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelCore i3-8300T
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500X
AMDPRO A10-9700E vs
IntelPentium Gold G5600T
