AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 810 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 810

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1971 vs 1206
  • Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1207 vs 738
  • 10x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.314 vs 0.33
  • Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.172 vs 0.099
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.432 vs 2.408
Specifications (specs)
Launch date February 2009 vs January 2008
Number of cores 4 vs 2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 1971 vs 1206
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1207 vs 738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.314 vs 0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.172 vs 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.432 vs 2.408

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

  • Around 15% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1237 vs 1034
  • Around 20% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 352
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 7.907
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
L2 cache 6144 KB vs 512 KB (per core)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1237 vs 1034
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 422 vs 352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 26.311 vs 7.907

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 810
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1034
1237
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1971
1206
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
352
422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1207
738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.314
0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
7.907
26.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.172
0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.432
2.408
Name AMD Phenom II X4 810 Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
PassMark - Single thread mark 1034 1237
PassMark - CPU mark 1971 1206
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 352 422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1207 738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.314 0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.907 26.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.172 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.432 2.408
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 2400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.68

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Phenom II X4 810 Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Essentials

Architecture codename Deneb Wolfdale
Launch date February 2009 January 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $116
Place in performance rating 2986 2973
Price now $115.99 $129.95
Value for money (0-100) 7.94 4.87
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Processor Number E8400
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 258 mm 107 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 6144 KB
L3 cache 4096 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 45 nm
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz 3 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Transistor count 758 million 410 million
Base frequency 3.00 GHz
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C
Maximum core temperature 72.4°C
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3 LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)